With the publication of the final rules there is now only a year to go before firms must comply with their Consumer Duty obligations. The FCA has emphasized that this must be a major cultural shift. While it’s good news that the implementation deadline has been extended slightly to 31 July 2023 (31 July 2024 for closed products which are no longer on sale), there are a number of changes from the draft rules and guidance that firms will need to get to grips with. Implementation projects should now be stepping up a gear; by the end of October 2022 implementation plans must have been approved by firms’ boards with evidence of challenge and scrutiny to make sure the plans are sufficiently robust.
What’s changed from the consultation proposals?
Many firms will already be familiar with the content of the draft rules and non-Handbook guidance, even if they have not undertaken a large-scale implementation activity yet.
The final rules and guidance contain a number of changes to what was previously being proposed, including:
- Implementation – timetable and expectations for firms: There will be a phased approach to implementation. Firms will need to apply the Consumer Duty to new and existing products and services that are open to sale (or renewal) from 31 July 2023. The FCA has given firms longer (until 31 July 2024) to apply the Consumer Duty to products and services held in closed books. It sets out its expectations and has provided a roadmap for how firms will use this implementation period to effectively embed the Consumer Duty.
- Application of the Consumer Duty to existing products and services: The FCA confirms that the Consumer Duty will apply, on a forward-looking basis, to existing products and services, including closed book products and services. It has, however, added to the final rules and guidance in relation to how firms can apply the price and value rules specifically to existing products and services, and how they can conduct the review in a proportionate manner. There are also new rules to help in future sales of product and service books.
- Scope: The FCA is retaining the proposed scope of the Consumer Duty to include customers with whom a firm does not have a direct relationship, but it has introduced additional guidance to clarify and set out its expectations of different parties in the distribution chain. There is also additional guidance on liability of firms in the distribution chain and for non-UK activities/customers.
- The cross-cutting rules – forseeable harm: The FCA has reverted to the wording in its first consultation (CP21/13) where it proposed requiring firms to ‘avoid causing foreseeable harm to customers’. This had been shortened in its second consultation (CP21/36) to ‘avoid foreseeable harm’, in response to concerns that this could have made firms liable for harm outside of their responsibility or control.
- The four outcomes: The rules (and guidance) have been amended to address respondents’ concerns about overlap of the products and services outcome with the existing PROD product governance rules. On price and value, the policy statement accompanying the final rules contains further commentary on the FCA’s fair value requirements, including confirmation that its rules are not intended to prevent cross subsides between products, or require firms to move onto cost plus pricing. For the consumer outcome understanding, the rules have been changed to move away from references to the ‘average’ customer and clarify that the FCA wants firms to ensure their communications are likely to be understood by the customers intended to receive the communication.
- Governance and culture: There are new requirements for the governance process, including for the governing body to receive reports and carry out an annual review.
Issues for firms to consider in light of the final rules and guidance
Firms only have 12 months to implement the bulk of the requirements, and there is a significant amount to fit into that time. In particular, we think firms will need to consider or (for those who have already made a start on implementation planning) look again at the following areas now that the final rules and guidance are out:
- Understanding the regulators’ expectations: The Consumer Duty includes new concepts, such as “avoiding causing foreseeable harm”, which firms will need to interpret in the context of their business.
- Price and value: Firms will be required to carry out value assessments, and for many firms there is little or no guidance or precedent on how to approach that exercise.
- Product governance: Firms will need to consider whether their existing product governance arrangements are adequate. For example, we believe that the FCA will expect a more granular assessment of target markets, and more product testing. There will also be new challenges for many firms, such as identifying behavioral biases.
- Customer understanding: With an increased emphasis on customers being able to understand the risks of a product or service, firms may need to revisit their customer-facing materials.
- Third party relationships: Firms may need to reconsider the nature of their relationships with third parties (eg manufacturers, distributors and outsource providers).
Firms will also need to continue to bear the risks of litigation and regulatory action in mind as they implement the Consumer Duty requirements:
- Private right of action: No private right of action (PROA) will be introduced for breaches of any part of the Duty at this time. However, the FCA has made several changes to the Duty that it says may help to replicate the benefits of a PROA, including (i) strengthening governance and accountability requirements; and (ii) strengthening its redress requirements under the Duty: the FCA sees proactivity by firms in providing redress where appropriate as a crucial element of the delivery of good outcomes for customers. And a PROA has not been finally dismissed: the FCA has confirmed that any future decision to attach a PROA to the Duty would be subject to further consultation.
- FOS: Consumers’ main route for redress will be via the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), with whom the FCA is working closely. The FCA has specifically identified FOS final decisions on complaints about fees or charges, or inappropriate product or service sales, as one of the ways in which it can monitor whether consumers are getting products and services which meet their needs and provide fair value, making it even more important that firms engage with the FOS process.
- Intervention and enforcement: Once the Duty is in force, the FCA will focus on monitoring, detecting, triaging and acting on breaches. It will use its intervention powers to manage ongoing or immediate risks and require corrective action where necessary. Where the FCA identifies serious misconduct by firms, it will use its full range of powers, including investigating, and where appropriate, its deterrent and remedial powers including issuing fines and securing redress for customers who have suffered harm.
- Individuals: The FCA has made clear that the focus on delivering good outcomes must be supported by individual accountability and personal conduct resulting from the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SMCR). Each senior manager should be clear about what they are responsible and accountable for, and how they are ensuing that the business of the firm complies with the requirements of the Duty on an ongoing basis. A new Individual Conduct Rule 6 requires all conduct rules staff to act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers where the activities of the firm fall within the scope of the Duty. The FCA has also amended its guidance to make clear that firms should have a champion at board level who, along with the Chair and the CEO, ensures that the Duty is discussed regularly and raised in all relevant discussions.
The above are concerns that apply across the whole of financial services. However, there are also more nuanced concerns that will apply to particular sub-sectors. For example:
The road ahead: the importance of project planning for a cultural shift
Whilst the implementation times have been extended by a short period, for some firms there may still be a lot to get through in the time available. We would recommend firms undertake robust planning to ensure a road to readiness for implementation. The FCA has laid out the requirement that by the end of October 2022, firms’ boards (or equivalent management body) should have agreed their implementation plans and be able to show they have scrutinised and challenged the plans to ensure they are deliverable and robust enough to meet the new regulatory standards.
Implementation of the Consumer Duty is broader than uplifts to existing arrangements: this is a cultural shift to the way firms operate, from the development of propositions through to servicing customers. Whilst a project may require review of policies, processes, frameworks and technology, a key focus is testing the outcomes of changes made. The questions that firms need to ask are:
- How will we test what has changed?
- How will we test effectiveness?
- What will we measure?
- Does governance provide the right visibility and demonstrate appropriate action is being taken?
The practicalities: what should firms do now?
To make best use of the available time, we recommend firms do the following:
- Set up projects with multiple workstreams covering a combination of top-down gap analysis and updating reporting requirements (including identification of appropriate sources of information).
- Look at more detailed bottom-up analysis of specific product expectations (including whether they present fair value), existing support arrangements, appropriateness of communications and operational monitoring of good (and poor) outcomes.
- Relevant stakeholders throughout the firm will need to be engaged from the outset to ensure that all parts of the business understand the requirements and support the changes required to effectively the Consumer Duty.
It is also important that effective project governance and control is put in place to ensure analysis and implementation activity is carried out in line with the initial plan. Any potential blockers should be identified by the project team at an early stage to allow decisions to be taken by senior managers on how to move forward.